ISG AI Impact Summit 2026 – New York Exhibitor List

The event has a fixed footprint in the published research: two days, 28 and 29 October 2026, in New York, United States, organised by Information Services Group (ISG). The industry framing is artificial intelligence, enterprise IT and digital transformation, and the official event page sits at aiimpact.isg-one.com/newyork. ISG also maintains a past-events area for the New York edition. That matters for anyone using this exhibitor list, because it means the 2026 participant roster can be read against earlier New York iterations rather than in isolation. Just as important is what the research does not state. No venue is named, no exhibitor count is published, and no attendee figure is given. Those gaps are left visible here rather than filled with estimates. Anyone building a travel or meeting plan around the summit should treat the city and the dates as settled, and the venue and scale as unconfirmed until ISG publishes them. The summit's three industry tags form the organising principle for this exhibitor data: every company recorded is placed within AI, enterprise IT or digital transformation coverage, or a combination of those.

• Dates: 28–29 October 2026
• City: New York, United States
• Organiser: Information Services Group (ISG)
• Industry tags: AI, enterprise IT, digital transformation
• Official event page: aiimpact.isg-one.com/newyork
• Venue, exhibitor and attendee totals not published in the reviewed material

Because ISG frames this summit around artificial intelligence, enterprise IT and digital transformation, the companies that take part as exhibitors sit in three broad camps, and the exhibitor list separates them accordingly: AI platform and tooling providers, enterprise IT services and systems integration firms, and digital transformation advisory or delivery consultancies. Companies whose offers cross more than one camp are tagged on both counts rather than forced into a single category. The research supplied for this page does not contain a published roster of 2026 exhibiting companies, and no exhibitor names, stand numbers or totals are asserted here. What the list does is hold the structure ready: category tags, participation status and a source for each participant, filled in as ISG publishes participant information on the New York event page and its related channels. That distinction matters when briefing a procurement or partner team. A directory that guesses at names is worse than an empty column, because it sends outreach in the wrong direction. Until a company is confirmed by an ISG source, it is not listed as an exhibitor for the October 2026 edition.

• AI platform and tooling vendors
• Enterprise IT services and systems integration firms
• Digital transformation advisory and delivery consultancies
• Cross-category participants tagged under more than one sector
• No 2026 exhibitor names recorded without a traceable ISG source
• Participation status held separately from sector classification

For a buyer, the useful part of an exhibitor list is not length but resolution. This one is built so each record answers a small set of questions: who the company is, which of the summit's three industry tags it belongs to, whether its participation is confirmed by an ISG source or carried from an earlier New York edition, where that information came from, and when it was last checked. Buyers working in enterprise IT, partner management, sourcing and analyst relations can filter by category, drop the names they already work with, and arrive at a shortlist small enough to brief internally. What the reviewed material does not provide is a floorplan or stand numbering, so the data supports who to meet rather than where to walk. It also does not carry exhibitor totals, which means any percentage or ranking built on this list would be built on nothing. The honest use is comparative: this AI platform, that services firm, that consultancy — grouped by what they do, sourced, and dated, so the shortlist survives scrutiny when someone asks how a name got onto it.

• Company name and sector tags mapped to the summit's three industries
• Participation status separated from sector classification
• Source attribution for every recorded participant
• Date last checked, so staleness is visible
• Filters suited to incumbent-supplier exclusion and shortlist building
• No booth numbers or floorplan in the reviewed material

ISG runs this summit and also maintains its own event archive for New York, which makes the exhibitor list unusually easy to audit: there is a single organiser, a single city and a short date window, so participants can be traced rather than inferred. The practical value for an enterprise IT or digital transformation team is compression. Two days in New York in late October pull AI platform vendors, enterprise IT service providers and transformation consultancies into one place, which means vendor evaluation that would otherwise be scattered across separate calls can be sequenced around a single trip. The exhibitor list is the tool that makes that sequencing possible before the dates arrive: it shows which companies to approach for a meeting, which to leave for a follow-up, and which are simply not relevant to a given programme. It is also a signal of where the market is concentrating attention — if a cluster of participants shares a category, that category is where the summit's conversations will sit. No claim is made here about halls, scale or attendance, because ISG has not published those figures for 2026.

• One organiser, one city, one two-day window to plan around
• Vendor evaluation compressed into a single New York trip
• Shortlisting possible before meeting requests go out
• Category clusters reveal where the summit's focus sits
• Auditable against ISG's own past-events archive
• Scale claims avoided where no 2026 figures exist

New York is the city attached to this edition, and the research names no other location for the 2026 summit. The presence of a past-events page and a 2025 New York brochure suggests the city has hosted the ISG AI Impact Summit before, which gives the 2026 exhibitor list a local history to sit against. For exhibitors and buyer teams based on the US East Coast, that means a domestic venue rather than a long-haul commitment, and a tighter logistics picture when the October dates come round. What cannot be assumed is where in the city the summit will be held: no venue appears in the material reviewed, so hotel blocks, walking distances and on-site meeting rooms cannot be planned yet. The sensible reading is that New York is confirmed and the rest is pending. Buyers using the exhibitor data should therefore treat the city as the fixed point and keep venue-dependent planning — meeting room bookings, stand visits, evening events — on hold until ISG publishes further detail on the official event page.

• New York is the only city named for the 2026 edition
• Past-events page indicates earlier New York iterations
• Domestic US East Coast travel for many exhibitors and buyers
• No venue published, so on-site logistics remain open
• Meeting plans should be built around companies, not locations

The exhibitor list is assembled from a defined set of sources rather than open-ended searching. Those sources are ISG's New York event page at aiimpact.isg-one.com/newyork, ISG's past-events page for the same event, an ISG LinkedIn post about the summit, a third-party event listing from WNS covering the 2025 New York edition, and ISG's own 2025 New York brochure in PDF form. Each of those contributes something different: the event page for current 2026 framing, the past-events page and 2025 materials for historical context on how the New York edition has been run, and the third-party listing as a cross-check on names and dates. The scope boundary matters as much as the source list. This exhibitor data does not attempt to cover other ISG events, other AI conferences in New York, or vendors with no connection to this summit. It also does not treat 2025 participants as 2026 exhibitors; that inference would misrepresent companies that have not confirmed for October. Where a source conflicts with another, the conflict is recorded rather than resolved silently.

• ISG New York event page as the primary 2026 reference
• ISG past-events page for earlier New York editions
• ISG LinkedIn announcement of the summit
• WNS event listing covering the 2025 New York edition
• ISG 2025 New York brochure PDF as background
• No 2025 participant treated as a 2026 exhibitor by default

The window between now and late October 2026 is when the exhibitor list earns its keep. A workable sequence starts with segmentation: split the recorded participants by the summit's three industry tags, then by whether they are platform, services or consultancy businesses. From there, a sourcing or partner team can remove existing suppliers where the relationship is already covered, and flag the names that fill a genuine gap in an AI or transformation programme. Meeting requests come next, and they are easier to justify when the request names the category and the reason rather than the event alone. Because confirmations may still arrive, the list should be revisited in the weeks immediately before 28 October, with attention to the date-last-checked field on each record. Analyst-relations and vendor-management functions can use the same data differently: to see which of their incumbent vendors will be present, and to prepare for conversations that will otherwise happen unplanned on the day. Nothing in this workflow depends on attendee numbers or hall plans, neither of which is available for 2026.

• Segment participants by industry tag and business type
• Exclude existing suppliers to expose real gaps
• Justify meeting requests by category rather than by event name
• Re-check records close to 28 October as confirmations arrive
• Use participation status to prepare incumbent-vendor conversations
• Workflow holds without attendee counts or floorplans

ISG's past-events page and the existence of a 2025 New York brochure, plus a WNS event listing for the 2025 New York edition, together indicate that the ISG AI Impact Summit has run in New York before. That gives the 2026 exhibitor list a comparison axis that a first-time event would not have. Once 2026 names are published, the useful comparison is directional: which companies carried over from the earlier New York format, and which sectors are showing up that did not before. That kind of comparison is only meaningful if the two years are kept apart in the data. A company that exhibited in 2025 has no automatic place in the 2026 column, and the list says so rather than merging the years into one undifferentiated set of names. Historical material is also useful for a different reason: it shows how ISG has presented the New York edition previously, which helps a planning team anticipate the shape of the October 2026 programme without pretending to know its content in advance.

• Past-events page and 2025 New York brochure establish a New York lineage
• 2025 and 2026 participation held in separate fields
• Carry-over versus newly present sectors becomes visible once names publish
• Historical material informs format expectations, not participant lists
• No year-on-year totals available to compare
• WNS listing used as a cross-reference for the 2025 edition

Three facts are firm for planning: the summit runs 28 and 29 October 2026, it takes place in New York, and Information Services Group is the organiser. Registration and programme detail belong on the official event page, aiimpact.isg-one.com/newyork, which is the only registration route referenced in the research; no alternative ticketing channel is recorded here. Everything venue-related remains open. With no location named in the reviewed material, any plan that assumes a specific Manhattan address, a particular hotel cluster or a set number of exhibition halls is working from an assumption rather than a fact. The same applies to scale: no exhibitor count and no attendee count exist for the 2026 edition in the sources reviewed, so neither should be quoted in an internal brief as though it were known. Diary the dates, keep the exhibitor list in view as it fills, and confirm venue and timings against ISG's own page closer to October rather than relying on second-hand summaries.

• Dates fixed: 28 and 29 October 2026
• City fixed: New York, United States
• Organiser fixed: Information Services Group (ISG)
• Registration referenced only via aiimpact.isg-one.com/newyork
• Venue unconfirmed in the reviewed material
• Exhibitor and attendee counts unavailable for 2026

This page is deliberately explicit about what it does not know, because an exhibitor list loses its value the moment it starts filling blanks with plausible-sounding detail. Three fields remain empty for the 2026 edition in the reviewed material: the venue, the exhibitor count and the attendee count. If those figures appear elsewhere, they should be checked against their own date and edition before being repeated — a 2025 number describes 2025, not this October. Verification works backwards from each record to its source, whether that is ISG's New York event page, the past-events page, the ISG LinkedIn announcement, the WNS listing of the 2025 edition, or the 2025 New York brochure. If a company listed here is not taking part, or a participant is missing, the correction route is the source field on the record itself: the entry is revised or removed once the underlying ISG information changes, rather than being kept for the sake of a fuller-looking list. Uncertainty is stated, not smoothed over.

• Venue, exhibitor count and attendee count left blank, not estimated
• Historical figures labelled as historical, never as 2026 data
• Every record traceable to a named source
• Corrections applied when underlying ISG information changes
• Entries removed rather than retained for list length
• Conflicting sources recorded rather than silently reconciled